When I showed different people the graphic I made comparing my salary with that of Albert Pujols over the next ten years, I noticed they tended to overestimate the amount of money I earned by a good margin. In fact, I earn less per year than the average male, 25-34 years old, with a bachelor’s degree or more.
I attribute the reason for this over-estimation to the fact that I used the areas of circles to represent the two salaries, and in my experience people (myself included) are just generally bad at discerning relative areas. While making the graphic, I had to triple check my arithmetic because the picture I saw didn’t match intuitively with the numbers I had in mind.
So here’s another take. The area of each figure still represents the salaries of myself and Albert Pujols, but now the figures are rectangles, and each rectangle has the same width. Therefore, to compare relative sizes, you only need to compare a single dimension (the height) rather than two.




